One hears, anecdotally, examples of the unreasonable behaviour of spouses cited in divorce petitions, ranging from the upsetting to the absolutely unpublishable. One petitioner, for example, was aggrieved to discover her husband had a dating profile. Another complained that her husband had been insufficiently sympathetic on the death of the family cat. To make matters worse, she alleged that he had unreasonably refused to agree to the cat being professionally stuffed and displayed in the parties’ living room.

It may be stating the obvious that obtaining a divorce can be acrimonious. The current law in England and Wales, which does not allow no-fault divorce, does not help. It is possible to divorce by agreement if both parties are willing to wait two years after separation — but if there is no agreement, it’s five years. Another option is ‘desertion’, although rare in practice.

Otherwise, if you want an immediate divorce, it’s a blame game: unreasonable behaviour or adultery. With the former it is necessary to produce examples (as above). The latter is inevitably contentious (the third party can even be named, although this is discouraged unless the adultery is denied). Neither is likely to lead smoothly to the putting aside of differences and resolving matters in a spirit of harmonious post-matrimonial accord. While people often feel strongly about the reasons for a breakup, the question of fault is rarely black and white, and where the question of fault has no impact whatsoever on financial matters, it is difficult to understand the point of asking it.

However, this process is about to change with the introduction of no-fault divorce in England and Wales, which is coming into effect on 6 April 2022. It’s the biggest change to divorce law in 50 years — and it’s been a long time coming.

Practitioners have been trying to take the heat out of the process for years by encouraging petitioners to use anodyne examples of unreasonable behaviour and respondents to accept them. This rather unsatisfactory workaround suffered a spectacular setback in the case of Owens v Owens, in which the examples of the husband’s behaviour were considered too mild (he was a little moody at times). The wife was left trapped in the marriage. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, but it was unable to help because it is not for judges to make law (which is Parliament’s job), but to interpret it.  The then President of the Family Division felt able to criticise it (‘based on hypocrisy and lack of intellectual honesty’).

There has followed a challenging period in which lawyers have encouraged their clients to beef up their examples of unreasonable behaviour to avoid this predicament (or reserve the right to do so in the event their spouse defends the divorce).

Calls for reform spanning a few decades have at last been heeded to: Colloquially referred to as no-fault divorce, the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 received royal assent in June 2020 and will come into force on 6 April 2022. This will be the biggest reform of divorce law in fifty years. Critically, there will no longer be a requirement to prove that a party is at fault and it will no longer be possible to defend a divorce suit (except in the case of fraud, an invalid marriage or if the English court should not be hearing the case). Further, one party will no longer have to petition against another; they will be able to apply jointly for a divorce.

Will this be an end to acrimonious divorce battles? Of course not. The reality is that only a tiny proportion of divorce cases are defended and the main dispute almost always concerns finances. This will not change.

However, consigning the concept of fault and the old-fashioned notion of a “guilty party” to the dustbin of legal history will remove one unnecessarily painful part of the process. Who can fault that?

Latest News

Read

MI5 and FBI sound the alarm on online espionage with LinkedIn a prime target

Foreign spies are using fake LinkedIn profiles on an “industrial scale” to gain information about the United Kingdom’s national security, with more than 10,000 “disguised approaches” detected by MI5 in the last...

Capital Monitor

Read

PR experts on newsjacking: A useful practice or unethical marketing?

In a recent 2022 survey from the New Statesman Media Group, newsjacking – brands aligning with current events or cultural issues – was chosen as the least unethical marketing practice,...

Press Gazette

Read

UHNWs may think differently due to their level of wealth, according to analysis

‘The rich are different from you and me,’ F. Scott Fitzgerald once remarked to Ernest Hemingway. ‘Yes,’ Hemingway shot back (or so the story goes). ‘They have more money.’ But...

Spear's

Read

Finance and its crucial role in achieving Net Zero

As investments into environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds continue to grow (current estimates suggest more than $330bn in assets globally), it is still surprising to some that financial institutions...

Capital Monitor

Read

Inflation is eating away at Britain’s schools and hospitals

When the governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, asked companies in February to exercise “pay restraint”, he did so because the Bank is tasked with keeping inflation low...

The New Statesman

Read

Sotheby’s Marks Platinum Jubilee with Royal Exhibitions

This June, the Queen will become the first British monarch to celebrate her Platinum Jubilee after 70 years on the throne. To mark this once-in-a-lifetime special occasion, Sotheby’s is putting...

Elite Traveler

Read

The tech industry’s progress on carbon emissions has been mixed

The technology industry is under increasing pressure to reduce its carbon emissions. It currently accounts for 2% to 3% of global emissions, according to the UN, but as more of the...

Tech Monitor

Read

How no-fault divorce will change family law in England and Wales

One hears, anecdotally, examples of the unreasonable behaviour of spouses cited in divorce petitions, ranging from the upsetting to the absolutely unpublishable. One petitioner, for example, was aggrieved to discover her...

Spear's

Read

Marketing experts reveal alternatives to third party cookies

Third- party cookies were ditched from Mozilla Firefox and Apple Safari years ago, but as Google follows suit, brands, businesses and organisations will be forced to look elsewhere for accurate...

Press Gazette